|
How this guide was prepared. Last updated October 2026. It draws on Brandmovers' experience designing, relaunching and migrating loyalty programs for consumer and B2B brands, including one program described below, as reported on its case page. It also draws on PwC survey data and publications from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the US Department of Transportation, listed under Sources. |
Canceling a loyalty program means ending it for every member: closing enrollment, setting a last date to earn and a last date to redeem, and then closing accounts. A planned, well-communicated ending is usually called a sunset. The alternatives are to fix the program, restructure it, relaunch it or move it to a new platform.
A struggling program is not always a failing one, and a failing program is not always worth saving. This guide covers the signs a program is not working, what to check before deciding, the alternatives to canceling, what canceling costs, when ending is the right call, which members are affected most, how to make the decision and how to end a program well if that is the answer.
|
A program is struggling when few members stay active, rewards cost more than the extra purchases they drive, or members buy no differently from similar customers outside it.
Common warning signs include:
Doubts about loyalty programs are common. In PwC's 2025 survey of 406 US executives at consumer-facing companies with $100 million or more in revenue, 57% said their loyalty systems are not delivering the outcomes they need, and the survey found that "46% of executives say their company's current loyalty program will be irrelevant in three years" (PwC). That is a reason to examine a program, not proof that it should end.
Before deciding, check four areas: the program's economics, member activity, the design of earning and rewards, and the operations and technology that run the program.
|
Area |
Question to answer |
Evidence to use |
Typical fix if this is the problem |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Economics |
Does the program return more than it costs? |
Incremental margin against a comparison group; reward, platform and service costs |
Lower-cost rewards; earning focused on profitable behavior |
|
Member activity |
Are members joining, earning and redeeming? |
Active rate at 30, 60 and 90 days; redemption rate; lapsed members |
Reachable first reward; onboarding and reminders |
|
Design |
Do members value the rewards and understand the rules? |
Surveys, complaints, which rewards get redeemed |
Simpler rules; rewards members want; experiences or recognition |
|
Operations and technology |
Can the program run reliably and use its data? |
Service contacts, errors, integration gaps |
Process fixes or a new platform |
A program can fail in one area and work in the others. If members are active but rewards cost too much, the fix is economic; if the economics work but few members engage, the fix is design and communication. The guide to loyalty program economics covers how to measure the financial side.
The main alternatives are to fix specific problems, restructure rewards or rules, relaunch with a new design, or migrate to a new platform while keeping members.
|
Option |
What changes |
When it fits |
Effect on members |
Relative cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Fix |
Specific rules, rewards, messages or processes |
One or two clear problems |
Small; mostly positive |
Low |
|
Restructure |
Earning rates, reward prices, tiers |
Economics or design are off |
Mixed; reductions need notice |
Moderate |
|
Relaunch |
New design and branding, members carried over |
The program feels dated or confusing |
Noticeable; needs clear communication |
Moderate to high |
|
Migrate |
Platform or provider, program kept |
Technology or vendor is the problem |
Low if balances and status carry over |
Moderate |
|
Sunset |
The program ends |
Even a redesigned program cannot pay for itself |
Large; needs notice and a redemption window |
Varies |
A simpler, lower-cost program, such as one with fewer rewards or member perks without points, is another middle path between restructuring and ending. Fixes can be modest. Experience-based or recognition rewards can add value without matching discounts; personalized rewards for birthdays and anniversaries give members a reason to return; and gamification can make earning more engaging. Any change that reduces the value of points members hold needs advance notice, which the guide to announcing loyalty program changes covers.
|
Case study (disclosed by Brandmovers). Aquatrols, which sells soil surfactants and other specialty products through distributors mostly to golf courses and turf managers, faced losing its B2B loyalty program when its "previous vendor shut down." Its case page notes that customers "had become accustomed to earning points and redeeming for rewards," so a long disruption risked the customer relationship. To keep the program running, Aquatrols moved it to Brandmovers' BENGAGED™ platform, and "Within a few short months, the Approach Loyalty Program launched to users with all of the existing program functionality, integrations, and reward options customers were accustomed to," with improvements the case page describes in key areas, including user experience. The case page reports that "Sales during off-season months have increased as much as 23% at times" and that customers are "consistently averaging between 1.08 and 1.17 categories purchased per month per user." The page does not state the baseline for the increase or compare results with customers outside the program. The program was not struggling; the move was forced by the vendor's exit, so the case shows what a migration involves rather than whether a weak program should be saved. |
Moving a program to a new platform keeps members, but it carries its own risks. Audit the data first: member records, balances, pending points, tier status and transaction history. Map the earning and reward rules to the new system, rebuild integrations with point of sale, ecommerce and customer records, and test that each member's balance and status come across correctly before switching. Keep a record of every member's position on the day of the move in case of disputes, and tell members what changes for them, such as how they sign in. Aquatrols' requirements, as its case page lists them, included the ability to "Allow for seamless transition of existing user data and point balances" and to "Relaunch quickly with minimum disruption to current users."
Canceling has costs beyond the program budget: points members still hold, member reaction, lost customer data, service and communication work, and the expense of starting again later.
Keeping a failing program has costs too: rewards that do not change behavior, a platform that consumes budget and a member experience that may harm the brand. The decision is a comparison of two sets of costs, not a choice between cost and no cost.
Any change or ending hits some members harder than others: the most active members, those holding large balances or near a tier, lapsed members and, in B2B programs, partners.
Look at the membership by segment before deciding, because the average member can hide the people with the most at stake:
Segment results also sharpen the decision itself: a program that loses money on average may still return more than it costs among its best members, if their incremental results hold up against a comparison group, which points toward a restructure aimed at them rather than an ending.
Canceling can be right when even a redesigned program cannot return more than it costs, the business no longer needs it, or members clearly do not value it.
Brandmovers builds and runs loyalty programs, so it has a commercial interest in programs continuing; that is one reason this guide sets out plainly when ending is the better choice. Ending a program is reasonable when:
When ending is the answer, ending it well matters more than avoiding the decision. A clear, fair sunset can protect the relationship better than a neglected program left running.
The decision should rest on evidence: measure incremental value against a comparison group, model each option with finance, test changes first and set decision criteria in advance.
1. Name the goal: what the program is supposed to change, such as purchase frequency, retention or first-party data.
2. Measure incremental value: compare members with similar customers who are not in the program, or hold back a group from a change. If almost every customer is a member or the program is small, a holdout from a change or a before-and-after comparison over matching seasons is the practical option; treat the result as directional.
3. Model the options with finance: include reward costs, platform and service costs, outstanding points and the cost of ending.
4. Test before committing: try the most promising fix with one segment or region.
5. Set the decision in advance: agree on the result that would justify keeping, changing or ending the program.
As an illustration: a program that costs $600,000 a year and produces $450,000 in incremental margin loses $150,000. If a redesign cuts cost by 20%, to $480,000, and lifts incremental margin by 20%, to $540,000, the program earns $60,000 a year instead, before any one-time cost of the redesign. Cheaper rewards can also lower the lift, so test the two changes together rather than assuming both. If tested changes cannot close the gap, the case for ending it is stronger. These figures are illustrative; use your own costs and measured results.
End a program with advance notice, a last date to earn, a period to redeem, clear answers for members and a plan for their data, following the program's terms.
Announce the ending before it happens, say when earning stops and when redemption ends, and keep redemption open for a period after earning stops so members can use their points. Check the program's terms for notice commitments and whether any state rules affect how points expire, and whether points members bought or that convert to cash or gift cards are treated differently. Plan for members who hold large balances, for a surge in redemptions after the announcement (reward cost, stock and fulfillment), and for members whose balances are too small to reach any reward, for example with a low-value reward or credit. In B2B programs, tell partners and account managers first, and check partner agreements for incentives, rebates or funds already earned or committed for the current period. Decide what happens to member data under the brand's privacy notice and any state privacy laws that apply, and prepare customer service with answers before the announcement. The transition playbook covers sunset timelines, communication sequencing, migrations and relaunches step by step. This is general information, not legal advice.
Canceling a loyalty program should be a decision made on evidence, not frustration. Find out why the program is struggling, fix what can be fixed, consider a relaunch or migration that can keep members and their history, and weigh the costs of ending against the costs of continuing. If ending is right, end it with notice and a fair chance to redeem. What would your program need to show in the next six months to earn its place?
|
Thinking about fixing, relaunching or ending a loyalty program? Brandmovers designs and runs consumer programs on the BLOYL™ platform and B2B channel programs on BENGAGED, including migrations from other providers. Request a demo to talk through your program's options with the Brandmovers team. |