|
How this guide was prepared. Last updated October 2026. It draws on Brandmovers' experience running promotions and loyalty programs, including the DiGiorno and Gerber promotions described below as their case pages report them. Rules were checked against the state statutes, California law and regulation, and FTC and FCC guidance cited. The case studies show what those promotions reported, not benchmarks. This is general information, not legal advice. |
Testing a loyalty program with promotions means running a purchase-linked promotion, such as a receipt-based reward, a multi-step challenge or a sweepstakes, to learn whether customers will register, share data and buy again before the brand commits to a full loyalty program. It tests interest and operations, but not the program's long-term economics.
A loyalty program is a long-term commitment: rules, rewards, a platform, member service and, for points-based programs, a liability for points that members have earned but not yet used. Promotions share many of the same parts (registration, purchase proof, rewards, fulfillment and reporting), so a brand can use one to learn about its customers and its own team before building a program. This guide covers what a promotion can and cannot tell a brand, which promotion to run, what to measure, when to go ahead, how to carry participants into a program, the rules that differ, two examples and how to build in phases. It is written for consumer brands; B2B channel programs usually test with sales incentives instead.
|
A promotion can show whether customers register, share data and respond to rewards, and whether the team can run it; it cannot show long-term behavior or program economics.
|
Question |
What a promotion can show |
What it cannot show |
|---|---|---|
|
Will customers sign up? |
Registration rate and drop-off in the sign-up flow |
Whether they would join a program with no prize on offer |
|
Will they share data? |
Opt-in rates and which fields people complete |
How data sharing holds up over months |
|
Will they prove purchases? |
Receipt upload rates and rejection reasons |
How often they would upload over a year |
|
Do rewards change behavior? |
Response to an offer during the promotion |
Whether earning toward rewards changes buying over time |
|
Can the team run it? |
Customer service volume, fulfillment, fraud review |
The load of a permanent program |
|
What will it cost? |
Cost of the promotion and its rewards |
Points liability and the program's costs over time |
The biggest limit is that prize-driven entries are not loyalty. People who enter a sweepstakes may be chasing the prize, and a short promotion says little about whether earning points over months would change what they buy.
Choose the promotion that answers the question: a receipt-based reward or multi-step challenge tests repeat purchasing better than a single sweepstakes.
A promotion that repeats or runs over several weeks tells the brand more than a single drawing, because it shows whether people come back. Run it long enough for a normal repeat purchase of the product to happen.
Brands with an existing customer email or CRM list can test more cleanly by offering a short earn-and-reward challenge to a random part of that list and comparing it with the rest.
Measure registration, data sharing, receipt uploads and, above all, whether participants buy again after the promotion compared with similar customers who did not take part.
People who enter promotions may already be the brand's keenest customers, and matching on past purchases does not remove the difference in motivation. Where possible, hold the offer back from a random share of an existing customer list, or from a set of comparable stores or regions, and compare against that group. With a small number of participants, differences in repeat purchasing can be chance, so treat small tests as directional or run them longer.
Brands that sell only through retailers usually cannot see non-participants' purchases. Options include keeping a small receipt reward running after the promotion so participants keep uploading, comparing sales in stores or regions that ran the promotion with ones that did not, or using retailer or syndicated sales data where the brand has access.
The guide to running a loyalty pilot covers comparison groups in more detail.
Move ahead when participants register, share data and buy again more than comparable customers, the team can run the operation, and the economics of a program look workable.
Set the thresholds for each of these before the promotion starts, so the result is judged against a target rather than read after the fact.
If participants entered but did not buy again, the promotion may still be worth running for reach, but it is weak evidence for a loyalty program.
A promotion costs less and runs faster than a pilot, but it answers fewer questions. A limited pilot of the actual program, in a few markets or for one customer segment, is the way to test earning, redemption and costs directly.
Plan consent and notices at the start, so participants who opted in can be invited to the program and their data used as they agreed.
For a business covered by California's consumer privacy law, a loyalty program that offers benefits in exchange for personal information needs a Notice of Financial Incentive that explains "the material terms" so "the consumer may make an informed decision about whether to participate," and it must be "readily available where consumers will encounter it before opting-in" (Cal. Code Regs. tit. 11, § 7016). The test promotion can need one too: the statute provides that "A business may offer financial incentives, including payments to consumers as compensation, for the collection of personal information..." (Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.125), so entries or rewards offered for personal information may count.
Case study (disclosed by Brandmovers). For the Feeling Gerber Good sweepstakes, a promotion with no purchase involved, visitors could watch a daily video and then "register or log in to MyGerber for an entry into the sweepstakes." "Over 15k entrants submitted 62k+ entries during the month-long promotion. 1/3 of the entrants created new MyGerber accounts during the promotion period, and over 70% of entrants opted-in to receive future communications from Gerber on Gerber products and formula." That is the kind of registration and opt-in evidence a brand needs before inviting participants into a program; because entry did not involve a purchase, it says nothing about buying, and the case page does not report later purchases.
Sweepstakes and instant win games need a free way to enter and may need state registration; a loyalty program needs its own terms and privacy notices.
The 2026 sweepstakes and promotions compliance guide covers official rules and registration in more detail. This is general information, not legal advice.
A purchase-linked promotion can show reach, registration and receipt behavior, but the brand still needs purchase data after the promotion to judge loyalty potential.
Case study (disclosed by Brandmovers). For the DiGiorno Chaotic Good 'Stakes, a two-month sweepstakes tied to Marvel Studios' Deadpool & Wolverine, DiGiorno set out to "Capture first-party data for future marketing" and "Encourage product purchase and receipt uploads." Fans could register to enter and "Upload receipts for up to five additional entries, rewarding verified purchases," and the promotion drew "140k+ Total Entries." The case page says each entry and receipt upload helped the brand "understand who their pizza fans were, where they shop, and how often they buy." The page reports entries, not later repeat purchases, which is the gap a loyalty test would need to fill.
Expand in phases: from a single promotion to recurring campaigns that let registered customers earn over time, then to a program with the features it needs at launch.
Brandmovers' Crawl/Walk/Run methodology, covered in the guide to modular loyalty programs, follows this phased approach. BLOYL™, Brandmovers' enterprise loyalty platform, includes a promotions builder for sweepstakes, contests, instant wins and bonus events alongside the loyalty program, with OCR receipt validation and A/B testing against a control group.
A promotion is a practical way to test whether customers will register, share data and prove purchases, and whether the brand's team can run a program, before committing to one. It cannot show long-term loyalty or program economics on its own. Choose a promotion that repeats, measure repeat purchases against similar customers, plan consent so participants can move into a program, follow the rules for each, and build in phases.
|
Testing whether a loyalty program fits? Brandmovers runs purchase-linked promotions and loyalty programs, and BLOYL includes a promotions builder alongside the loyalty program. Request a demo to talk it through with the Brandmovers team. |